Satan's Super Spawn?

Initial research indicates the practice of egg donation is spurring in some regions a statistically significant alteration in both the new and controversial Raswani Social Intelligence scale and the more traditional Stanford-Binet IQ test.

Nationwide testing has been prompted by what some educators are calling an exponential change in the behaviour of kindergarten children. "We noticed a real big difference," said Anita Cunnings, a teacher's assistant at St. Mark's, a grade school in an upper middle class neighbourhood of Chicago. "Back when I first started this job in 2015 we'd sometimes get a kid who was not only smart, but smart all around, who really knew how to handle other kids and how to make the world work for her, or him. Then it got to be one every year, then two, and now we have half a dozen or more every year. They're almost perfect. To tell you the truth, they're a little frightening."

A local bus driver, who prefers to remain anonymous, was less circumspect. "Spawn of Satan," he said. "It ain't natural. These kids, they climb on the bus, they say please and thank you, and they read all the way to school. Lord knows, I can't abide all the yellin' and runnin' up and down of normal kids but this ain't natural."

White, upper middle class women in the 45-48 age range are particularly affected. "It's only to be expected," said a harassed looking Dr. Judith Sternberg returning from testimony to a congressional ethics sub-committee. "Record numbers of career-oriented, smart, well-educated women are now choosing, in their mid-forties and older, to have children. And they're choosing extremely smart, well-educated, women in their twenties to be the donors. The rest is a matter of simple genetics."

"Nonsense," responds Mike Chattergee, an educational sociologist, who tugs at his greying beard in obvious frustration. "The deciding factor is the child's upbringing. These older mothers are, well, they're older, and more affluent, so they can give the infant everything it needs in the way of education and nurture. Better nurturing means a happier, healthier, more well-adjusted child. An older, more confident mother is also going to impart some of that attitude as the child grows. It's a good thing." He pauses. "Do you think I'm too old to be a father?"

A corollary of the egg donation boom is the change in behaviour noted in the spouses of married mothers. "It's good old fashioned competition," said a red-faced Jack Donatelli at the bowling alley in Midwich, CT. "Women get to choose the father and if you can't hack it, then move aside for someone who can."

"There's nothing old-fashioned about it," says his companion, who would only give his name as Bill. "Look at me, see that muscle? Strong as an ox. Good job. But that's not enough any more. No. Now it's "Oh, Bill, why don't you do the laundry while I write that proposal for the UK office? Oh, Bill, why don't you just wash the kitchen floor while I'm at the gym?" Because I don't f----- want to, that's why, but do I say anything? No. Because if I do, she'll get someone else to father her goddamn test tube baby, and I'll be slaving away to support a goddam cuckoo child!"

Some church leaders have long decried the commercialisation of egg donation. "Life is a gift from God," said the archbishop of Chicago. "When one woman who is blessed with fertility can help bring joy to another, that gift should be given freely." Unitarians, on the other hand, believe god is in everything, even the test tube and the bank account. Other religions, such as Islam, forbid the procedure entirely. But ethics, argues the Director for Reproductive Health at the Women's Clinic, have nothing to do with it. "It's all very well wishing things were different," says Dr. Allison Toomin, "but this is the real world. What healthy twenty-two year old college senior in her right mind would go through a month of pain, daily injections, bloating, hormonal disturbance and the slight though very real chance of medical complications, just for altruism? Especially when prospective mothers are offering $75,000 and a trip around the world if the donor has SAT scores of over 1500, good looks, and perfect health."

Senator George W. Bush VI believes people like Dr. Toomin are wrong. "It's not acceptable," he tells voters gathered at a rally in the Texas panhandle. "These women are buying smarts for their babies. They're buying fertility. They're buying love and a secure old age, just because they were too darned selfish to stop working and have babies when they were young and healthy, while you good, god-fearing folks are so crippled by Big Government taxes that you can hardly scrape together the bread for your own little ones!"

Not far from the panhandle where Bush is speaking lies Austin, Texas, one of the epicentres of the intelligence spike now being observed all over the country. Other centres include Seattle, WA (and the whole Vancouver-Eugene corridor), the San Francisco Bay Area, certain neighbourhoods of larger cities such as Atlanta (Little Five Points and Lake Claire) and Boston (Jamaica Plains, Cambridge), and small liberal college towns like Montpelier, VT. "With the exception of Atlanta, these are all very white cities," points out M'Shelle N'dele Mbele, from the Urban Justice Centre in St. Louis. She smiles sardonically. "Wonder why that is." She goes on to point out that, like most racial issues, this is at heart a money-based discrimination. She would be hard-put to find anyone to argue with her. Reproduction via egg donation is an expensive and time-consuming procedure, but with a first-time success rate now approaching eighty percent, it's by far the most reliable of in-vitro technologies. Dr. Sternberg believes that as Americans approach the second half of the twenty-first century, egg donation is here to stay. "What I told the sub-committee, and I'm happy to say they agreed, is that we need to think about what this means for business. Global competition from emerging nations is threatening the ascendancy of US corporations. We need our female executives to remain focused on their jobs through their thirties and early forties and not be distracted by the idea of a biological clock. Egg donation lets us reset that clock, if not banish it all together. Right now America has the edge. Egg donation lets us keep it."

The ethics sub-committee has declared that there will no longer be regulation at the federal level of viable human ova, and the debate is underway regarding tax credits for donors and clinics. All parties expect controversy. For every egg donor and every prospective mother there will be someone like old-timer Sam Underhill, overheard recently at the Green Dragon Inn in Bywater, ME. "It's not natural," he said, "and trouble will come of it."

Original Publication: Nature, Vol 402, issue no. 6762.
Copyright Nicola Griffith, 1999

Back to Essays

Home